A health-related remark and meta-investigation was accomplished adopting the methodology off ‘Preferred Reporting Issues getting Systematic Critiques and you will Meta-Analyses’ (PRISMA) [19, 20].
avis de mariГ©e par correspondance
Document search and you will possibilities
A pursuit was achieved between , causing the gang of the next database: Education Resources Information Heart (ERIC), via ProQuest; Psychological Recommendations (PsycINFO), via APA PsycNET; Scientific Literature Study and Retrieval System (MEDLINE), via ProQuest; Scopus, thru Elsevier; and ISI Online off Technology (WoS Center Collection), thru Thomson Reuters. The word ‘sexting’ found in earlier review education [1, 2, cuatro, 11, 15, 22–24] was utilized as the an effective descriptor so you can select a life threatening number of studies originating in some medical areas, like those out of Therapy, Degree, Sociology, Technology, Wellness Sciences and you will Court Sciences. To help you promote a complete remark, an effective ‘grey literature’ research are achieved utilizing the Yahoo and Bing Beginner search engines like google to your pursuing the terminology: “sexting”, “sext”, “intimate messaging” and you may “sexual messaging”. A week alerts was in fact programmed for brand new look in the PsycINFO, Internet regarding Technology, and you may Scopus, up to . The fresh source directories of associated empirical stuff and you will feedback was basically including featured to identify most other probably eligible education. Likewise, i contacted associated experts through age-post and/or ResearchGate so you’re able to request complete-texts or to gather additional information on its studies (six off 17 solicitations had been responded, and you will step 3 satisfied the needs). So you’re able to facilitate replication of the comment, S1 Dining table has the particular look strategy used in for every single database consulted.
Addition and you may different conditions
In accordance with the said expectations associated with look, training had been integrated if they: a) aimed to look at the new incidence out-of sexting and you can/or its correlates; b) made-up a sample away from members up to 18 yrs old; c) provided modern empirical data; and you can d) were available in English otherwise Language. Regarding the introduction criterion a beneficial), around three you are able to prevalence percent was noticed when it comes to for each and every analysis, related respectively into certain measures off: sending; receiving; and forwarding.
Earliest, content meeting the brand new inclusion standards was indeed chosen, and you may, when behavior cannot be made on the term and you can abstract by yourself, the full papers is retrieved as well. The fresh new chosen papers was indeed featured separately because of the people CME and you can ELG. Any discrepancies have been solved courtesy conversation having a 3rd blogger (JML) where necessary.
Additional education taking a look at investigation regarding same research project were integrated only when the shot or even the way of measuring sexting differed among her or him. S2 Desk summarizes this new omitted studies, while you are Fig step one illustrates the fresh new flowchart of one’s systematic remark procedure. The studies as part of the meta-data try referenced in S1 Appendix.
Studies coding
To possess coding motives, another data, in addition to bibliometric pointers while the browse tips of your brand-new knowledge, is registered: a) style of book (knowledge or master thesis, blog post or report, peer-assessed, not fellow-assessed otherwise around opinion); b) 12 months out-of publication of your investigation; c) year of information collection; d) geographic origin of the samples categorized predicated on seven-continent design: Africa, China, European countries, United states, South usa, Antarctica and you can Oceania/Australia; e) investigation framework (cross-sectional otherwise longitudinal questionnaire); f) particular shot (probabilistic or non-probabilistic); g) site population (age.grams., preadolescents, middle school college students, students); h) test size and you may proportion of females; i) variety, indicate and standard deviation of age the participants; j) administration processes (telephone or deal with-to-face interview, online, paper-centered or blended questionnaire); k) content posts (text messages, images/video clips, or each other); l) degree of sexual explicitness of your own articles (naked, not naked, both); m) perspective in which sexting is actually practiced (romantic relationship, other people or perhaps not laid out); n) readiness of members from inside the sexting tips (sending: volunteer, maybe not voluntary, perhaps not outlined; receiving: solicited, unwanted, not outlined; forwarding: that have consent, without consent, not discussed); o) timeframe of your own way of measuring sexting (? 6 months otherwise > six months, lifetime, or not discussed); and you may p) sexting step prevalence abilities (delivering, acquiring, forwarding).
